TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says he has no confidence in these hated names, and neither should you.
The financials are flying -- there are finally bids for most of them underneath. Many, including Lehman (NYSE: LEH) (Cramer's Take), are running. What a great time to put the negative cards on the table and put the negatives in perspective. That's right, let's look at the financial Achilles' heels. What could go wrong? In other words, here's the companion piece to Doug Kass' positive conversion. Here's what I am worried about even as Doug thinks everyone's too worried and the bottom is being put in.
To get started, let's look at what's not causing the endless declines in the stocks -- don't worry, we will get to the financial dirty dozen when I finish this preamble.
First, it ain't earnings. Earnings aren't going to be that great. But that's why the S&P is at 14 times. It can go to 12 or 11, or most likely stays at 13-14, but the E goes down (earnings).
Second, it ain't oil. The stocks sensitive to the increase in oil have room to go down, but the price of oil is being factored in slowly but surely.
Third, it isn't inflation or recession. Those two are being baked in each day.
While those names could sound tempting for investors who may think they are cheap, BusinessWeek's Karyn McCormack reminds us that not everything that is cheap is a good bargain, and there are some risks that need to be taken into account.
One common problem for most of these stocks is that they trade under $10 for a reason. That reason is usually hardly any earnings growth, if any at all. And with a weak economy, these companies would have an even harder time to stimulate growth. Add to the mix the fact that institutional investors don't like to touch stocks under $10 and the potential for recovery is not good.
Wachovia (NYSE:WB) is recently down 87c to $15.35. WB call option volume of 56,113 contracts compares to put volume of 37,393 contracts. WB July option implied volatility of 100 is above its 26-week average of 54 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price movement.
Washington Mutual (NYSE:WM) is recently up 20c to $5.00. WM entered into a definite agreement to raise $7 billion through direct sale of securities to TPG Capital and other investors on April 8. WM call option volume of 41,183 contracts compares to put volume of 14,010 contracts. WM July and August option implied volatility of 133 is above its 26-week average of 76 according to Track Data, suggesting larger movement.
Option Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com
TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says with few exceptions, the landscape is littered with corpses.
Sell everything. Nothing's working. Revisit when the prices are adjusted for a big recession, soaring inflation and a crushed consumer. Sell at 12,000 and come back at 10,000. Even better: short it.
Are you going to argue with any of that? Do you have a case against it? What's the counter? Takeovers? We've had a couple: Anheuser-Busch (NYSE: BUD) (Cramer's Take), Wrigley (NYSE: WWY) (Cramer's Take). Good if you owned them.
Lower rates? Can the Fed help? We assume the Fed is done. The odds favor higher rates. Bank turnarounds? How, with short-rates going up? With housing prices going down?
Can oil go down? Only with a worldwide crash, and with a worldwide crash, why would we come back at 10,000?
Can the consumer get more liquid? How? Unemployment's going higher. Wages won't go up in that environment.
That's the environment. It's pretty bulletproof when it comes to its logic.
TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says a do-nothing Fed signs the death certificate of the banks.
Time for the inflation hawks to recognize the stakes. Throughout the discussion as articulated in the papers and on TV, you hear of only two things with regard to the Fed, that the fundamentals are sound enough to stop cutting and that inflation worries command a shift to higher rates.
In the interest of understanding what has been happening in this market -- an unrelenting decline in all but the oil and fertilizer stocks since the Fed floated this stance -- you have to get your arms around the idea that this is it, an obituary, for all of the banks that need housing prices to increase and bad loans to decrease. Because despite the sound and quite cerebral approach the hawks are taking, unless we get a giant FHA bill out of Congress, you can pretty much be assured that most of the big banks in this country will be so radically under-reserved when they report that we might as well just give up on them.
How about that bill? It seems suddenly likely and it is important, I am not denying it. If we could get the FHA to have $300 billion in lending capacity and we agree that the FHA is basically going to have to take a beating, than you can make a case that we are only about a year away from a turn -- that was the tenor of the CSFB housing upgrade story yesterday, although it didn't rely on the FHA much at all in its prognostications.
TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says the acquired Bear Stearns portfolio is worth even less than he thought.
How bad was that Bear Stearns portfolio? I am beginning to believe that JPMorgan's (NYSE: JPM) (Cramer's Take) buy of Bear is looking like a big mistake. It can only be justified by what might have been an even bigger problem for JPM -- the collapse of the trades that Bear made, which were being processed by JPM's clearing.
We are now beginning to get a real sense of the worthlessness of the mortgage portfolios. Not that we got any help from the SEC, which has taken a "we don't care what's in the mortgages as long as you tell us you have mortgages" attitude. That's been worthless for investors, and maybe even for JPMorgan.
The losses now exceed $400 billion, according to my modeling (if you simply assumed that 50% of the exotic mortgages that were issued from 2005 to 2007 eventually went into default). That's amazing, but it looks like I dramatically underestimated the losses. UNDERESTIMATED!
The most egregious issuers of these exotic mortgages were Bear, Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER) (Cramer's Take) and Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH) (Cramer's Take). I believe that JPM has taken in a huge number of uninsurable, non-hedgeable mortgage instruments that are a pure write-off. And that means they are probably underwater on everything they took in.
Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM) is having such trouble that it will lay-off another 1,200 people.
According toReuters, "In an e-mail, Washington Mutual said it was cutting jobs that support its home lending unit, centralizing some support functions, and focusing on 'mission-critical activities.'" The announcement was part of a cascade of tough news for financial companies.
Not only have Lehman (NYSE: LEH) and Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) posted poor results, but Citigroup (NYSE:C) said its expected more write-offs through the end of the year. The head of hedge fund Paulson & Co. expects total losses at banks to hit $1.3 trillion, with two-thirds of it yet to come.
Short interest in most large financial companies moved up sharply in the period ending June 15. Shares short in Wachovia (NYSE: WB) moved up 26.2 million to 177.4 million. Short interest in Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) jumped 18.2 million to 82.7 million.
Most of this means that bank, brokerage and insurance shares could be much lower at the end of 2008. Many already trade at 52-week lows, but if losses mount, they will have to raise more money, and that means dilution.
Citigroup trades for under $20 in premarket action. As a bellwether for the industry, who would be surprised to see it at $10?
Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.
Stock futures were lower early Friday as investors seemed concerned about oil prices ahead of a weekend summit in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Meanwhile, financials kept the headlines this morning with Washington Mutual and airlines announcing jobs and cost cuts the main story there. It appears that the last day of this week might see some losses before heading into next week and the Federal Reserve meeting.
On Thrusday, stocks managed to finish the session higher after wobbly trading as oil prices dropped and Citigroup announced further writedowns. The Dow industrials ended 34 points, or 0.28%, higher, the S&P 500 added 5 points, or 0.38%, and the Nasdaq composite climbed 32 points, or 1.33%.
As there are no economic reports due today, investors will eye oil prices after crude-oil futures declined $5 a barrel Thursday following news that China is raising retail fuel prices starting Friday. As countries reduce subsidies for gas, many believe it could slow demand. This morning, oil prices traded a little higher at mid $132 per barrel.
Minyanville's Sean Udall dares to share the kind of keen insight and actionable information you won't find in any prospectus. For more original thought, visit www.minyanville.com.
Earlier in the week, I noted that Goldman Sachs(NYSE: GS) was well positioned to capitalize on what's happening in the financial services space. And nowhere is that becoming more clear than in the advice it's offering and capital raises it's conducting for troubled institutions like Fifth Third Bankcorp (NASDAQ: FITB), Wachovia(NYSE: WB) and Washington Mutual(NYSE: WM).
Like looking to IBM (NYSE: IBM) for your office computer needs in the old days, Goldman is now the obvious choice if you're a bank CEO under siege.
But this may be a short-term benefit for Goldman, as the excessive concentration of business in one firm ultimately puts that firm's whole franchise at risk. If the Goldman brand is to maintain value with investors, it must become increasingly selective as to who it sponsors. But being choosy puts clients at risk.
Minyanville's wise professor, Mark Bloudek, dares to share the kind of keen insight and actionable information you won't find in any prospectus. For more original thought, visit www.minyanville.com.
I've been doing precious little in this market, but one stock I've been tracking closely is Wachovia Corp. (NYSE: WB). Why would I pay more mind to Wachovia than to other banks? Because it bought Golden West Financial in May of 2006 for $25 billion. And where did Golden West have most of its exposure? That's right, California.
Last night I was looking through the median home price data in the Multiple Listing Service (MLS) in various California cities and noticed some shocking price drops. The median home price offers in San Francisco dropped $10,000 in one week. Ditto for Orange County. In Los Angeles, the figure was a startling $13,000. I went back to check when the market topped in these areas and found that every one of them peaked in -- drum roll, please -- May of 2006.
TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says that rather than merging, these banks will have to raise money through dilutive offerings.
The big difference between 1990s bank implosion and this one is that nobody at other banks sees any value in owning the ones that are faltering.
Key (NYSE: KEY) (Cramer's Take) is the latest example. Key's everywhere, it is grandfathered to be in every state. You would think there was some bank out there that would want it. Nope. No one. So they have to do this down round that destroys the common. Nobody wants Sovereign (NYSE: SOV) (Cramer's Take) either. Or Nat City (NYSE: NCC) (Cramer's Take). Or Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM) (Cramer's Take). The latter's really interesting now that Hudson City (NYSE: HCBK) (Cramer's Take) has passed it in market size because it says that all of those branches and all of that deposit base just doesn't mean anything. Or worse, the losses are so bad that unless the Fed takes the losses and puts them on its balance sheet, there can be no consolidation.
Yet consolidation is the only way to go. Now, we are much more laissez-faire then we were in 1990. The administration then felt engaged to move quickly to set up mergers instead of the charade of down rounds. I call them charades because none of them yet has produced a return for anyone who has put the money up.
And yet my best indicator, the Standard & Poor's oscillator, which you can order from their Web site, is saying you cannot be short here and should be doing some buying. The oscillator, when it has been at minus 5, has called a bottom almost every time in the last decade, plus or minus a day or two, and a percent or even two, and I have long since learned not to see through it.
Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM) is recently up 76 cents to $7.01. WM entered into a definite agreement to raise $7 billion through direct sale of securities to TPG Capital and other investors on April 8. WM June 7 straddle is priced at $1.34, WM July 7 straddle is priced at $2.40. WM July option implied volatility of 124 is above its 26-week average of 71 according to Track Data, suggesting larger movement.
Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) is recently up 35 cents to $39.77. MS is scheduled to report Q2 EPS on June 18. MS June option implied volatility is at 67; July is at 51; above its 26-week average of 45 according to Track Data, suggesting larger price risk.
Option Update is provided by Stock Specialist Paul Foster of theflyonthewall.com.
TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says constant vacillations and inconsistent messages have conspired to extend this crisis.
There was a reason to go ballistic. The financial system was falling apart because of bad loans that have since been magnified by huge leverage and dubious dividends.
And here we are, more than a year into the crisis, and the Federal Reserve and Treasury still refuse to admit the obvious, despite hideous data every day -- yesterday Lehman (NYSE: LEH) (Cramer's Take) and Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM) (Cramer's Take), today UBS (NYSE: UBS) (Cramer's Take) -- that something has to give. We are either going to be worried about a housing recession or worried about inflation. We cannot be worried about both. Because of this half-in/half-out viewpoint, we have continually failed to address either problem.
Last year was the year to cut and cut big to get refinancings done and allow banks to build capital by playing the yield curve, a la 1990. They blew that. They were worried about inflation. This year you either have to take a severe recession and just crush American business so it uses less energy and crush the American homeowner so he can't pay and then merge all of the banks, or you say we are going to solve the recession/housing conundrum first and address the inflation we can address: ethanol-based food inflation. You cannot do both! You have to take them sequentially.
Minyanville's top dog, Todd Harrison, dares to ask in public what Wall Street types quietly consider in private. For more insight and ideas, visit www.Minyanville.com.
If Lehman (LEH) isn't the second coming of Bear Stearns, won't "sell the rumor, buy the news" come into play?
Why can't I shake the sense that a serious downside dislocation is lurking in the wings this summer?
Given the massive two-sided directional potential, have you defined your risk (both ways) in kind?
After all, doesn't setting stops remove emotion?
Another day, another dime (10%) for WaMu (WM) the killer whale?
What does it say that the New York Stock Exchange internals are still flat to the share?
The weak market conditions have caused many stock prices to fall under $10. Not only smaller -- and perhaps lesser known -- stocks trade under $10 these days, but also some big and famous names such as 
Wachovia
Stock futures were lower early Friday as investors seemed concerned about oil prices ahead of a weekend summit in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Meanwhile, financials kept the headlines this morning with Washington Mutual and airlines announcing jobs and cost cuts the main story there. It appears that the last day of this week might see some losses before heading into next week and the Federal Reserve meeting.
Minyanville's Sean Udall dares to share the kind of keen insight and actionable information you won't find in any prospectus. For more original thought, visit 
Comfort Zone Investing: Keep your recovery expectations real
Will Americans have to slim down to fit into their cars?
Starbucks: The next McDonald's
